A purpose of the dispute between the presidents of Colombia and Venezuela, with all the bickering, let me excerpt is ColumnN opinion. As they say, "why mourn over spilled milk." Find a culprit in this series of errors is not healthy, but knowing the incendiary character of the two leaders.
only thing is that the hostages will continue to be victims of personal interests and policies cad-to-day humanitarian agreement goes farther. This sumemosle now growing diplomatic tension . Rather, the remedy worse than the disease:
What did the monkey and Uribe
Daniel Samper Pizano. Diario El Tiempo columnist.
President Alvaro Uribe made two errors in the process of incorporation of Hugo Chavez as a mediator humanitarian exchange and its subsequent clearance: first, the way he got, the second, the way he drew.
López replied as follows: "Have you seen the monkey when it is appropriate to eat 
a wild pit? The first thing medírsela does is compared to the throat, to verify that you entered. And second, medírsela back there, to be sure it comes out. Before appointing Echandía minister should be sure that, when the time comes, you can call for his resignation or dismiss him without affecting the government. "
Uribe Clearly you did not care to be measured Chavez back before the swallow as a facilitator, so the expulsion of the pit was abruptly and leaving painful tears. The President himself admitted that he had acted like a monkey improvidente saying "we do not calculate what for many was a risk political. "
such irresponsibility has been an earthquake. They seemed so obvious hazards to include in the game to Chávez, that anyone would have imagined that Uribe and his aides the analyzers, weighed, the calculated and after income tax, withdrawals and clearing, decided to give the corresponding step. So one is left ojiplático to learn that not assessed the risk of Chavez or put enough thought into the eventual cost of removal. Many monkeys were killed or sick with similar foresight. The result is unfortunate: after a few days of dead calm, Chavez and Uribe have reincarnated in the worst version themselves, and are starring in the show over banana-and more dangerous, "to remember our neighborly relations. Chávez is shown as a cutlass that expels personal diatribes, but Uribe has rampant McCarthyism with its accusations of state of incalculable gravity.
If anything reveals this crisis is exactly the opposite of what Uribe says we need a UN protectorate
Chavez Linking humanitarian process and subsequent overthrow by show press release the vagaries and inconsistencies of Uribe's policy against the humanitarian exchange. Uribe can not claim it was surprised by the closure of the FARC, the ultimate cause of the delicate situation, because we all know how far this group lives in a barbarian world, outdated, cruel and unrealistic. Nor is it credible that a harmless conversation between Chavez and Colombian General constitutes an egregious attack on national security. But given the papayazo the imitator of Bolivar, and this is not wasted. Meanwhile, Tirofijo must be dead from laughter.
photo: www.washingtonhispanic.com / ... / g
uribe.jp The truth is that Uribe does not want humanitarian exchanges and contact with the guerrillas. Not understood, then, how it plays with the hopes of his countrymen and the feelings of the abductees and their families by encouraging an adventure that, in pectore, was born dead.
If you do not want the pit, why eat it accepted? And if accepted eat, why not imitate the wise moves made prior to the monkey?
As for the outcome of the first story, Lleras Echandía appointed justice minister in 1966, the venerable teacher held for a few days
